[elvin-discuss] Re: Elvin spec

Ian Lister ilister at mantara.com
Wed Jan 10 17:29:18 CST 2007

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, David Arnold wrote:
> neither of those error codes are _protocol_ errors.  they're
> Mantara-specific libelvin error codes.

Right, because this is in reply to:

On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, David Arnold wrote:
> most important is the NACK code, i think.  there's not much
> alternative for a client library than passing back a NOT_SUPPORTED to
> the application, but given it's allowable to have routers without
> quench, etc, it's gotta be reported somehow.

What the client library passes back to the application is the API, not the 
protocol, and NOT_SUPPORTED is a Mantara libelvin error code.


More information about the elvin-discuss mailing list